2005 Senate Bill 880 / 2006 Public Act 399

Regulate annuity sales to seniors

Introduced in the Senate

Nov. 9, 2005

Introduced by Sen. Gerald Van Woerkom (R-34)

To require an insurance company to have reasonable grounds to believe that a recommendation to a senior consumer to purchase an annuity was suitable to the consumer based on his or her financial situation, after making reasonable efforts to obtain the a senior's financial information. Compliance with National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) rules would satisfy the bill's requirements.

Referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions

Feb. 7, 2006

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

Feb. 8, 2006

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Feb. 9, 2006

Passed in the Senate 34 to 0 (details)

Received in the House

Feb. 9, 2006

Referred to the Committee on Insurance

June 28, 2006

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

Sept. 6, 2006

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Sept. 7, 2006

Passed in the House 94 to 4 (details)

To require an insurance company to have reasonable grounds to believe that a recommendation to a senior consumer to purchase an annuity was suitable to the consumer based on his or her financial situation, after making reasonable efforts to obtain the a senior's financial information. Compliance with National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) rules would satisfy the bill's requirements.

Received in the Senate

Sept. 12, 2006

Sept. 13, 2006

Amendment offered by Sen. Burton Leland (D-5)

To also give the state insurance commissioner the authority to order an insurance company to reimburse a policy holder for harm caused by a violation of the regulations proposed by the bill.

The amendment failed 14 to 22 (details)

Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)

To concur with the House-passed version of the bill, which authorizes higher penalties when the embezzlement is committed against a senior citizen or vulnerable person.

Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm

Sept. 29, 2006