Introduced
by
To revise the procedures for a plaintiff's affidavit of merit and a defendant's affidavit of meritorious defense in a medical malpractice case. These affidavits are required in malpractice cases, and certify for the plaintiff that a qualified health professional has reviewed the records of the case and believes it has merit, and vice-versa for the defendant. Under the bill, either party would be allowed to request an affidavit of merit from the opposing party.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-4) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that allows a plaintiff to amend an affidavit of merit to correct a "formal defect," and establish timetables and procedures for challenging the amendment.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To revise the definition of a "formal defect" in an affidavit of merit.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 58 to 37 (details)
To allow a plaintiff in a medical malpractice lawsuit to amend the affidavit of merit to correct a "formal defect," and establish timetables and procedures for challenging the amendment. The affidavit of merit is required in malpractice suits, and certifies that a qualified health professional has reviewed the records of the case and believes it has merit. See also House Bill 5905.
Referred to the Committee on Commerce and Labor
