2003 House Bill 5006

Authorize "conscientious objector" status for health care providers

Introduced in the House

July 17, 2003

Introduced by Rep. Randy Richardville (R-56)

To establish in statute the right of an individual health care provider to assert as a matter of conscience, on ethical, moral, or religious grounds, an objection to providing or participating in a health care procedure (such as abortion or abortion-inducing drugs like RU 486), and prohibit his or her employer from participating in such procedures.

Referred to the Committee on Health Policy

March 30, 2004

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

April 21, 2004

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one containing technical changes that do not affect its substance as previously described.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Randy Richardville (R-56)

To strike out a provision authorizing conscientious objector status based on "professional" grounds, rather than on ethical, moral, or religious grounds.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Ruth Johnson (R-46)

To strike out a provision authorizing conscientious objector status based objections to providing a contraceptive "device".

The amendment passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Gretchen Whitmer (D-69)

To strike out a provision authorizing conscientious objector status based on objections to providing a "morning after pill," defined as "a medication or combination of medications or device that prevent pregnancy by preventing ovulation or fertilization of an egg that is taken or used after sexual intercourse”.

The amendment failed 34 to 68 (details)

Passed in the House 69 to 35 (details)

Received in the Senate

April 22, 2004

Referred to the Committee on Health Policy