Introduced
by
To give the state greater authority and streamline the process relating to the enforcement of custody or parenting time order violations, and require commencement of civil proceedings to resolve parenting time disputes if other means have not worked. The bill would require the court to assess costs of up to $250 if a party to a parenting time dispute has acted in bad faith. The bill is part of a legislative package comprised of House Bills 6004 to 6012, 6017, and 6020.
Referred to the Committee on Civil Law and the Judiciary
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one which eliminates the proposal to change the name of the Friend of the Court office to the "Court Family Services Office," and incorporates other detail changes resulting from committee testimony and deliberation. These do not affect the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To clarify a language in a provision contained in the bill.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To increase from 14 to 21 days the time a party in a custody or parenting time dispute has to challenge a makeup parenting time order, license revocation order, contempt ruling, etc.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 102 to 0 (details)
To give the state greater authority and streamline the process relating to the enforcement of custody or parenting time order violations, and require commencement of civil proceedings to resolve parenting time disputes if other means have not worked. The bill would require the court to assess costs of up to $250 if a party to a parenting time dispute has acted in bad faith. The bill is part of a legislative package comprised of House Bills 6004 to 6012, 6017, and 6020.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one which establishes specific "good cause" justifications for denying parenting time, and which contains other technical changes that do not affect its substance as previously described. The substitute was amended to clarify that it applies to both divorced parents, not just the one paying child support.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
Passed in the House 106 to 0 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
