Legislation watch

Who is my legislator?        Scorecards by rhamman        All scorecards        Close window        Create a scorecard              

Tea Party Scorecard - Corporate Welfare 2013

Created by rhamman

This is an extract of corporate welfare bills from the Michigan Tea Party Scorecard. Corporate Welfare provides taxpayer dollars to private companies through tax breaks, loans and outright grants. While theoretically well intentioned, in reality it is cronyism, and generally provides poor or abysmal results. While the film and "green energy" subsidies get the most publicity, there are many, many more examples. Given the opportunity for abuse and the history of abysmal results, we strongly oppose this practice, but do support lowering taxes for all businesses, not just a favored few. This is a public service of Independents for Responsible Government and is updated quarterly. More details are available at

DISCLAIMER: Scorecards are user-created and do not represent the views of Michigan Votes or the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
The user/creator is responsible for the scores and the preferred votes.

↓Score↓Sort by Legislator↓Party↓Selected      
Ideal Senate Vote >
50%Caswell, Bruce  (term)R ×××
50%Hune, Joe  (term)R ×××
33%Colbeck, Patrick  (term)R ××××
0%Ananich, Jim  (term)D ×××××
0%Anderson, Glenn  (term)D ××××××
0%Bieda, Steve  (term)D ××××××
0%Booher, Darwin  (term)R ××××××
0%Casperson, Tom  (term)R ××××××
0%Emmons, Judy  (term)R ××××××
0%Green, Michael  (term)R ×××××X
0%Gregory, Vincent  (term)D ××××××
0%Hansen, Goeff  (term)R ××××××
0%Hildenbrand, Dave  (term)R ××××××
0%Hood, Morris, III  (term)D ××××××
0%Hopgood, Hoon-Yung  (term)D ××××××
0%Hunter, Tupac  (term)D ××××××
0%Jansen, Mark  (term)R ××××××
0%Johnson, Bert  (term)D ××××X×
0%Jones, Rick  (term)R ××××××
0%Kahn, Roger  (term)R ××××××
0%Kowall, Mike  (term)R ××××××
0%Marleau, Jim  (term)R ××××××
0%Meekhof, Arlan  (term)R ××××××
0%Moolenaar, John  (term)R ××××××
0%Nofs, Mike  (term)R ××××××
0%Pappageorge, John  (term)R ×××XX×
0%Pavlov, Phil  (term)R ××××××
0%Proos, John  (term)R ××××××
0%Richardville, Randy  (term)R ××××××
0%Robertson, David  (term)R ××××××
0%Rocca, Tory  (term)R ××××××
0%Schuitmaker, Tonya  (term)R ××××××
0%Smith, Virgil  (term)D X×××X×
0%Walker, Howard  (term)R ××××××
0%Warren, Rebekah  (term)D ××××××
0%Whitmer, Gretchen  (term)D X×××××
0%Young, Coleman, II  (term)D ××××××
Ideal House Vote >
100%Goike, Ken  (term)R
100%Howrylak, Martin  (term)R
100%MacMaster, Greg  (term)R
100%McMillin, Tom  (term)R
100%Robinson, Rose Mary  (term)D
100%Somerville, Patrick  (term)R
67%Cotter, Kevin  (term)R ×
67%Genetski, Robert  (term)R ×
67%Hooker, Thomas  (term)R ×
67%Irwin, Jeff  (term)D ×
67%Johnson, Joel  (term)R ×
67%LaFontaine, Andrea  (term)R ×
67%Lund, Pete  (term)R ×
67%McBroom, Ed  (term)R ×
67%Price, Amanda  (term)R ×
67%Shirkey, Mike  (term)R ×
33%Banks, Brian  (term)D ××
33%Bumstead, Jon  (term)R ××
33%Geiss, Douglas  (term)D ××
33%Jenkins, Nancy  (term)R ××
33%Kelly, Tim  (term)R ××
33%Kesto, Klint  (term)R ××
33%Kurtz, Kenneth  (term)R ××
33%Lauwers, Dan  (term)R ××
33%Leonard, Tom  (term)R ××
33%MacGregor, Peter  (term)R ××
33%Nathan, David  (term)D ××
33%Nesbitt, Aric  (term)R ××
33%O'Brien, Margaret  (term)R ××
33%Outman, Rick  (term)R ××
33%Poleski, Earl  (term)R ××
33%Potvin, Phil  (term)R ××
33%Rendon, Bruce  (term)R ××
33%VerHeulen, Rob  (term)R ××
33%Victory, Roger  (term)R ××
33%Yonker, Ken  (term)R ××
0%Abed, Theresa  (term)D ×××
0%Ananich, Jim  (term)D ×
0%Barnett, Vicki  (term)D ×××
0%Bolger, James "Jase"  (term)R ×××
0%Brinks, Winnie  (term)D ×××
0%Brown, Terry  (term)D ×××
0%Brunner, Charles  (term)D ×××
0%Callton, Mike  (term)R ×××
0%Cavanagh, Phil  (term)D ×××
0%Clemente, Paul D.  (term)D ×××
0%Cochran, Tom  (term)D ×××
0%Crawford, Hugh  (term)R ×××
0%Daley, Kevin  (term)R ×××
0%Darany, George T.  (term)D ×××
0%Denby, Cindy  (term)R ×××
0%Dianda, Scott  (term)D ×××
0%Dillon, Brandon  (term)D ×××
0%Driskell, Gretchen  (term)D ×××
0%Durhal, Fred, III  (term)D ×××
0%Faris, Pam  (term)D ×××
0%Farrington, Jeff  (term)R ×××
0%Forlini, Anthony  (term)R ×××
0%Foster, Frank  (term)R ×××
0%Glardon, Ben  (term)R ×××
0%Graves, Joseph  (term)R ×××
0%Greimel, Tim  (term)D ×××
0%Haines, Gail  (term)R ×××
0%Haugh, Harold  (term)D ×××
0%Haveman, Joseph  (term)R ×××
0%Heise, Kurt  (term)R ×××
0%Hobbs, Rudy  (term)D ×××
0%Hovey-Wright, Marcia  (term)D ×XX
0%Jacobsen, Bradford  (term)R ×××
0%Kandrevas, Andrew  (term)D ×××
0%Kivela, John  (term)D ×××
0%Knezek, David  (term)D ×××
0%Kosowski, Robert  (term)D ×××
0%Kowall, Eileen  (term)R ×××
0%Lamonte, Collene  (term)D ×××
0%Lane, Marilyn  (term)D ×××
0%LaVoy, Bill  (term)D ×××
0%Lipton, Ellen  (term)D ×××
0%Lori, Matt  (term)R ×××
0%Lyons, Lisa  (term)R ×××
0%McCann, Sean  (term)D ×××
0%McCready, Michael  (term)R ×××
0%Muxlow, Paul  (term)R ×××
0%Oakes, Stacy Erwin  (term)D ×××
0%Olumba, John  (term)D ×××
0%Pagel, David  (term)R ×××
0%Pettalia, Peter  (term)R ×××
0%Pscholka, Al  (term)R ×××
0%Roberts, Sarah  (term)D ×××
0%Rogers, Bill  (term)R ×××
0%Rutledge, David E.  (term)D ×××
0%Santana, Harvey  (term)D ×××
0%Schmidt, Wayne  (term)R ×××
0%Schor, Andy  (term)D ×××
0%Segal, Kate  (term)D ×××
0%Singh, Sam  (term)D ×××
0%Slavens, Dian  (term)D ×××
0%Smiley, Charles  (term)D ×××
0%Stallworth, Thomas, III  (term)D ×××
0%Stamas, Jim  (term)R ×××
0%Stanley, Woodrow  (term)D ×××
0%Switalski, Jon  (term)D ×××
0%Talabi, Alberta Tinsley  (term)D ×××
0%Tlaib, Rashida  (term)D ×××
0%Townsend, Jim  (term)D ×××
0%Walsh, John  (term)R ×××
0%Yanez, Henry  (term)D ×××
0%Zemke, Adam  (term)D ×××
0%Zorn, Dale W.  (term)R ×××

Legend:   Correct,  × Incorrect,  
F Chamber failed to hold vote,  E Excused,  X Not Voting,  
? Ideal Vote not set,   No vote in this chamber


Column Descriptions

Senate Bill 123: SB 123 - Expand convention facility authorities
Allows borrowing and spending more to develop a "sports facility" in Grand Rapids - borrowing and spending for corporate welfare 
   • House Roll Call 89 on April 23, 2013.
   • Senate Roll Call on April 17, 2013.

Senate Bill 271: SB 271 - Revise developer subsidy regime
Increase the maximum "community revitalization" subsidy to any one developer from $1M to $2.5M. Also eliminate some restrictions on how funds can be spent and make reporting less transparent.
   • Senate Roll Call 266 on June 13, 2013.

Senate Bill 272: SB 272 - Developer "port facility" subsidies
Expand the mission of the Michigan Strategic Fund to include providing undefined subsidies for corporations, developers and other entities involved in port facilities.
   • Senate Roll Call 267 on June 13, 2013.

Senate Bill 347: SB 347 - Expand MSHDA Developer Subsidies
Authorize MSHDA to use reserve funds to invest in private companies purchasing multifamily housing projects
   • House Roll Call 283 on September 12, 2013.
   • Senate Roll Call 351 on September 17, 2013.

Senate Bill 257: SB 257 - Expand Business Improvement Zones
Broaden the authority of Business Improvement Zones - longer lifetime, easier to impose, more difficult to disband. These zones have the ability to tax property owners in a "zone" for mandated improvement projects
   • House Roll Call 284 on September 12, 2013.
   • Senate Roll Call 356 on September 18, 2013.

Senate Bill 397: SB 397 - Expand Corporate Subsidy
Create a 6th “Next Michigan Development Corporation,” which is a government agency that gives tax breaks and subsidies to particular corporations or developers selected by political appointees
   • Senate Roll Call 374 on September 26, 2013.


This user-created scorecard is available at

DISCLAIMER: Scorecards are user-created and do not represent the views of Michigan Votes or the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
The user/creator is responsible for the scores and the preferred votes.

Go to Top