To revise the conditions under which a physician may prescribe and authorize medical marijuana for a person, limiting this authority to “bona fide physical-patient relationships,” as defined in the bill. This would require the doctor to take a medical history of the patient; perform a relevant physical examination; review prior treatment, treatment responses and diagnostic test results; discuss advantages, disadvantages, alternatives, etc.; provide for monitoring; create and maintain records; and notify the patient's primary care physician, if any. Because the state’s medical marijuana law was adopted in a popular vote, the measure would require a three-fourths vote.   Official Text and Analysis.

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-7) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

To require medical marijuana grown outside to be securely locked in a fenced area.

To define details of the legal presumption in the medical marijuana law that if a patient and primary caregiver assert that the prescribed marijuana is being used for a medical purpose, then it is (and so the person can't be prosecuted for illegal possession).

To prohibit a doctor from prescribing medical marijuana unless there is a “bona fide physician-patient relationship,” as defined in the bill. This would require the doctor to get the patient's medical history, perform a physical and keep records. The bill also requires medical marijuana grown outside to be securely locked in a fenced area; and when transported to be in the trunk or a case inaccessible to vehicle occupants.

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

To prohibit a doctor from prescribing medical marijuana unless there is a “bona fide physician-patient relationship,” as defined in the bill.

To reconsider the vote by which the bill was defeated.

To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.