The executive recommendation for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Energy, Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.496 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $45.4 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $55.1 million. $1.008 billion is from federal funds, and another $407.3 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, compared to $400.2 million the previous year.   Official Text and Analysis.

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

The Appropriations Committee substitute. This was bypassed in favor of a version that contains additional changes in a few line items.

O reconsider the vote by which the House adopted the substitute previously recommended by the Committee on Appropriations.

The Appropriations committee substitute. This was bypassed in favor of a version that contains additional changes in a few line items.

To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Democratic-majority in the House on various spending items and programs. For details see analysis from the non-partisan House Fiscal Agency.

To require the Department to find ways to reduce the amount of general fund revenue used to support its operations by 3 percent.

To require the department to post on the internet a listing of all expenditures, including federal "stimulus" money, with the purpose of each (a "check register").

To prohibit the department from spending more than $10,000 to implement the "check register" provision proposed by the Rogers amendment that was adopted.

The House version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.495 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $43.9 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $55.1 million. $1.008 billion is from federal funds, and another $407.3 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, compared to $400.2 million the previous year.

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Republican-majority in the Senate on various spending items and programs. For details see analysis from the non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency.

To add $124,500, reportedly to fund a new government "Office of the Insurance Advocate".

To increase funding by $4.5 million on a government "no worker left behind" jobs training program.

To strip out language prohibiting the Granholm or next administration from using money in this budget to develop or impose "ergonomics" regulations on businesses.

To strip out language prohibiting the state insurance bureau from implementing a ban on insurance companies using credit scoring in establishing premiums.

The Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.260 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $47.6 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $55.1 million. $834.5 billion is from federal funds, and another $342.8 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, compared to $400.2 million the previous year.

To concur with a Senate-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.

The House-Senate conference report for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.278 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. $845.2 billion is from federal funds. $349.9 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, and $47.6 million is from the state general fund, compared to $400.2 million and $55.1 million the previous year, respectively. Note: The large decrease in gross spending is mainly due to transferring the $211 million Michigan State Housing Development Authority to the Department of Treasury.