Checkmark
Legislation watch

Search all years.

2010 House Bill 5884: Appropriations: 2010-2011 DELEG budget

Public Act 186 of 2010

Introduced by Rep. Richard Hammel (D) on February 24, 2010
The executive recommendation for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Energy, Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.496 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $45.4 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $55.1 million. $1.008 billion is from federal funds, and another $407.3 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, compared to $400.2 million the previous year.   Official Text and Analysis.
Referred to the House Appropriations Committee on February 24, 2010
Reported in the House on March 23, 2010
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on March 25, 2010
The Appropriations Committee substitute. This was bypassed in favor of a version that contains additional changes in a few line items.
The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on March 25, 2010
Moved to reconsider by Rep. Kathy Angerer (D) on March 25, 2010
O reconsider the vote by which the House adopted the substitute previously recommended by the Committee on Appropriations.
The motion passed by voice vote in the House on March 25, 2010
Substitute offered in the House on March 25, 2010
The Appropriations committee substitute. This was bypassed in favor of a version that contains additional changes in a few line items.
The substitute failed by voice vote in the House on March 25, 2010
Substitute offered by Rep. Richard Hammel (D) on March 25, 2010
To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Democratic-majority in the House on various spending items and programs. For details see analysis from the non-partisan House Fiscal Agency.
The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on March 25, 2010
Amendment offered by Rep. Richard Hammel (D) on March 25, 2010
To require the Department to find ways to reduce the amount of general fund revenue used to support its operations by 3 percent.
The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on March 25, 2010
Amendment offered by Rep. Bill Rogers (R) on March 25, 2010
To require the department to post on the internet a listing of all expenditures, including federal "stimulus" money, with the purpose of each (a "check register").
The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on March 25, 2010
Amendment offered by Rep. Richard Hammel (D) on March 25, 2010
To prohibit the department from spending more than $10,000 to implement the "check register" provision proposed by the Rogers amendment that was adopted.
The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on March 25, 2010
The House version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.495 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $43.9 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $55.1 million. $1.008 billion is from federal funds, and another $407.3 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, compared to $400.2 million the previous year.
Received in the Senate on April 14, 2010
Referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee on April 14, 2010
Reported in the Senate on May 14, 2010
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on May 18, 2010
To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Republican-majority in the Senate on various spending items and programs. For details see analysis from the non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency.
The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on May 18, 2010
Amendment offered by Sen. Martha G. Scott (D) on May 18, 2010
To add $124,500, reportedly to fund a new government "Office of the Insurance Advocate".
The amendment failed 16 to 22 in the Senate on May 18, 2010.
    See Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No".
Amendment offered by Sen. Glenn Anderson (D) on May 18, 2010
To increase funding by $4.5 million on a government "no worker left behind" jobs training program.
The amendment failed 16 to 22 in the Senate on May 18, 2010.
    See Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No".
Amendment offered by Sen. Martha G. Scott (D) on May 18, 2010
To strip out language prohibiting the Granholm or next administration from using money in this budget to develop or impose "ergonomics" regulations on businesses.
The amendment failed 16 to 22 in the Senate on May 18, 2010.
    See Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No".
Amendment offered by Sen. Martha G. Scott (D) on May 18, 2010
To strip out language prohibiting the state insurance bureau from implementing a ban on insurance companies using credit scoring in establishing premiums.
The amendment failed 15 to 22 in the Senate on May 18, 2010.
    See Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No".
The Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.260 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $47.6 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $55.1 million. $834.5 billion is from federal funds, and another $342.8 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, compared to $400.2 million the previous year.
Received in the House on May 19, 2010
To concur with a Senate-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.
Received in the Senate on September 21, 2010
The House-Senate conference report for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.278 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. $845.2 billion is from federal funds. $349.9 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, and $47.6 million is from the state general fund, compared to $400.2 million and $55.1 million the previous year, respectively. Note: The large decrease in gross spending is mainly due to transferring the $211 million Michigan State Housing Development Authority to the Department of Treasury.
Received in the House on September 21, 2010
Signed with line-item veto by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on September 30, 2010

Comments