Introduced
by
To require the Michigan Public Services Commission to do a feasibility study on expanding nuclear power generation in the state.
Referred to the Committee on Energy
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Amendment offered
by
To also require the proposed study to address "workforce and human health risks" associated with this form of electricity generation, and make cost comparisons between electricity generated by nuclear reactors, wind, solar and hydroelectric sources.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To also require the proposed study to address " the distribution of potassium iodine tablets to all residents within 50 miles of a nuclear energy generation facility”.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Passed in the House 85 to 20 (details)
To require the Michigan Public Services Commission to pay a consultant to do a feasibility study on expanding nuclear power generation in the state.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Technology
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the Senate 31 to 5 (details)
To require the Michigan Public Services Commission to pay a consultant to do a feasibility study on expanding nuclear power generation in the state.
Motion to reconsider
by
The vote by which the bill was passed.
The motion passed by voice vote
Received
Passed in the Senate 32 to 4 (details)
To require the Michigan Public Services Commission to pay a consultant to do a feasibility study on expanding nuclear power generation in the state.
Passed in the House 83 to 21 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
