2010 Senate Bill 1157 / Public Act 203

Appropriations: 2010-2011 Higher Education budget

Introduced in the Senate

Feb. 24, 2010

Introduced by Sen. Tony Stamas (R-36)

To provide the “template” or “place holder” for a Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Higher Education budget. This bill contains no appropriations, but may be amended at a later date to include them.

Referred to the Committee on Appropriations

March 23, 2010

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

Substitute offered

To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Republican-majority in the Senate on various spending items and programs. For details see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billanalysis/Senate/pdf/2009-SFA-1157-U.pdf">analysis</a> from the non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Sen. Liz Brater (D-18)

To strip out a provision establishing as the intent of the legislature that universities doing research with embryonic stem cells file an annual report to the legislature containing details on the embryos.

The amendment failed 12 to 25 (details)

Amendment offered by Sen. Liz Brater (D-18)

To not cut university operations grants by 3.1 percent from the previous year.

The amendment failed 16 to 21 (details)

Passed in the Senate 20 to 17 (details)

The Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 higher education budget. This would appropriate $1.569 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.612 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009, and $1.578 billion recommended by Gov. Granholm. Of this, $1.527 billion will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), $30.4 million is from "restricted funds," or earmarked state tax and fee revenue, and $11.8 million is federal revenue. This budget proposes a 3.1 percent cut to all 15 state universities and to the MSU Agricultural Experiment Station and the Cooperative Extension Service.

Received in the House

March 23, 2010

Referred to the Committee on Appropriations

May 21, 2010

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

June 8, 2010

Substitute offered

To adopt a version of this budget that does not contain a Senate-passed provision requiring additional reports from universities on their embryonic stem cell research, or one reducing university funding by 3.1 percent. For more details see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billanalysis/House/pdf/2009-HLA-1157-4.pdf">analysis</a> from the non-partisan House Fiscal Agency.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. David Agema (R-74)

To require universities to file a report with the legislature on their "efforts to accommodate the sincerely held religious beliefs of students enrolled in counseling degree programs".

The amendment failed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Bob Genetski (R-88)

To require universities to post on the internet a "check register" showing the amount and purpose of each expenditure.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Gail Haines (R-43)

To require the universities to create 5 percent spending reduction plans that avoid restrictions on spending cuts imposed as a condition of accepting federal "stimulus" money in the previous budget.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Dave Hildenbrand (R-86)

To add back a Senate-passed provision establishing as the intent of the legislature that universities doing research with embryonic stem cells file an annual report to the legislature containing details on the embryos. Note: Although this amendment was adopted in a record roll call vote, it was later eliminated by the voice-vote adoption of the Angerer substitute.

The amendment passed 58 to 48 (details)

Amendment offered by Rep. Tom McMillin (R-45)

To tie-bar the bill to House Joint Resolution AAA, meaning this bill cannot become law unless that one does also. HJR AAA is a proposed constitutional amendment that would require universities to post all expenditures on a searchable website, including purchases of goods and services, contracts, payroll, the salaries of individual employees and more.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Tom McMillin (R-45)

To tie-bar the bill to House Joint Resolution AAA, meaning this bill cannot become law unless the legislature places that resolution on the ballot. HJR AAA is a proposed constitutional amendment that would require universities to post all expenditures on a searchable website, including purchases of goods and services, contracts, payroll, the salaries of individual employees and more.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. David Agema (R-74)

To ban universites from giving employee health insurance or other benefits to the unmarried partners of the employees.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Substitute offered by Rep. Joan Bauer (D-68)

To adopt a version of this budget that does not contain the embryonic stem cell research reporting requirement previously adopted in the Hildebrand amendment.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Kathy Angerer (D-55)

To essentially prohibit a university from posting an online "check register" disclosing the amount and purpose of each expenditure by imposing a $100 limit on how much they could spend to accomplish this.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Dave Hildenbrand (R-86)

To add back a Senate-passed provision establishing as the intent of the legislature that universities doing research with embryonic stem cells file an annual report to the legislature containing details on the embryos.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Passed in the House 55 to 51 (details)

The Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 higher education budget. This would appropriate $1.625 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.612 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009, and $1.578 billion recommended by Gov. Granholm. Except for $4.5 million in federal money this is all state tax and fee revenue. The House version does not contain Senate-passed provisions reducing university spending by 3.1 percent and requiring additional reports from universities on their embryonic stem cell research.

Received in the Senate

June 9, 2010

To concur with a House-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.

Failed in the Senate 14 to 23 (details)

Received in the House

Sept. 28, 2010

Passed in the House 61 to 43 (details)

The House-Senate conference report for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 higher education budget. This would appropriate $1.578 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.612 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. This reduces state operations grants to universities by 2.8 percent. Agriculture experimental station and extension service spending are cut by the same amount (to $61.9 million). Senate-passed stem cell research reporting requirements are not included.

Received in the Senate

Sept. 28, 2010

Passed in the Senate 31 to 6 (details)

Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm

Oct. 11, 2010