Introduced
by
The executive recommendation for the FY 2001-2002 Department of Consumer and Industry Services budget. This appropriates $535.5 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to the current year’s $529.6 million, which was the amount enacted in 2000. $85.3 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $83.7 million.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Substitute offered
Which reflects changes adopted following committee testimony and discussion.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require the department to limit the number of day-care facilities inspected by each state inspector to 210.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 34 to 1 (details)
To adopt a Senate version of the FY 2001-2002 Department of Consumer and Industry Services budget. This appropriates $537.5 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to the current year’s $529.6 million, which was the amount enacted in 2000. $85.5 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $83.7 million.
Substitute offered
Which reflects changes adopted following committee testimony and discussion.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To provide an exemption to a "hiring freeze" if the funds to pay the employee are at least 80 percent supplied by federal funds.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require the department to provide training and civil service employment opportunities for state employees who lose their jobs as a result of an agency program being reorganized.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To prohibit the unemployment agency's remote initial claims center from using automated answering equipment during business hours, unless an option is to speak to a real person. Also, to prohibit keeping a caller on hold for more than five minutes.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require the department to limit the number of day-care facilities inspected by each state inspector to 210.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require the department to operate more unemployment offices in the U.P. if needed.
The amendment failed 49 to 54 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To require more detailed reporting from nursing homes to the state on staffing ratios.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require the department to accept bids that would allow the option of a single contractor for Upper Peninsula emergency medical services grants and contracts.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require Detroit to use state fire protection grants to supplement fire prevention efforts, upgrade fire fighting equipment, and provide support services for burn survivors and their families.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 102 to 1 (details)
To adopt a House version of the FY 2001-2002 Department of Consumer and Industry Services budget. This appropriates $536.3 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to the current year’s $529.6 million, which was the amount enacted in 2000. $84.3 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $83.7 million.
Failed in the Senate 0 to 35 (details)
The House-passed version of the bill.
Received
Failed in the Senate 0 to 35 (details)
The version of the bill reported by a House-Senate conference committee.
Received
Passed in the Senate 35 to 0 (details)
The final conference report for the FY 2001-2002 Department of Consumer and Industry Services budget. This appropriates $569.8 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to the current year’s $529.6 million, which was the amount enacted in 2000. $42.7 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $83.7 million. Te decrease in General Fund spending is overstated because the FY 2001-2002 figure is reduced by the transfer of more than $25 million worth of programs to the new Department of Arts, History, and Libraries. The increase in adjusted gross funding is overstated because it includes a $60 million restricted fund appropriation for low income energy assistance, facilitation of more efficient energy use by consumers, and more efficient energy distribution statewide (approximately $20 million each). The money would come from utility savings realized through the securitization of ‘stranded costs,’ which was part of the 2000 electric power deregulation package.
Passed in the House 105 to 2 (details)
The final conference report for the FY 2001-2002 Department of Consumer and Industry Services budget. This appropriates $569.8 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to the current year’s $529.6 million, which was the amount enacted in 2000. $42.7 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $83.7 million. Te decrease in General Fund spending is overstated because the FY 2001-2002 figure is reduced by the transfer of more than $25 million worth of programs to the new Department of Arts, History, and Libraries. The increase in adjusted gross funding is overstated because it includes a $60 million restricted fund appropriation for low income energy assistance, facilitation of more efficient energy use by consumers, and more efficient energy distribution statewide (approximately $20 million each). The money would come from utility savings realized through the securitization of ‘stranded costs,’ which was part of the 2000 electric power.
