Introduced
by
To make violations of proposed telemarketer bills an “unfair practice” under the state consumer protection act. "Unfair practices" are punishable by civil penalties and actual damages or $250 per violation, whichever is greater, plus reasonable attorney fees. The bill is part of a legislative package comprised of HB 4042, HB 4154, HB 4250, HB 4631, and HB 4632.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Technology
Substitute offered
Which reflects changes adopted following committee testimony and discussion.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To adopt a technical change in a definition contained in the bill.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 100 to 1 (details)
To make violations of proposed telemarketer bills an “unfair practice” under the state consumer protection act. "Unfair practices" are punishable by civil penalties and actual damages or $250 per violation, whichever is greater, plus reasonable attorney fees. The bill is part of a legislative package comprised of HB 4042, HB 4154, HB 4250, HB 4631, and HB 4632.
Substitute offered
by
To replace the previous version of the bill with a new one which prohibits telemarketers from using "caller I.D." blocking devices.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 33 to 0 (details)
To prohibit telemarketers from using "caller I.D." blocking devices. The bill is part of a legislative package comprised of HB 4042, HB 4154, HB 4250, HB 4631, and HB 4632.
Failed in the House 0 to 103 (details)
To not concur with a Senate-passed version of the bill, and sent it to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.
Passed in the House 92 to 0 (details)
To make violations of the telemarketer "do not call" list code of conduct proposed in House Bill 4042 an “unfair practice” under the state consumer protection act. "Unfair practices" are punishable by civil penalties.
Passed in the Senate 35 to 0 (details)
