2010 House Bill 5884 / Public Act 186

Appropriations: 2010-2011 DELEG budget

Introduced in the House

Feb. 24, 2010

Introduced by Rep. Richard Hammel (D-48)

The executive recommendation for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Energy, Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.496 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $45.4 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $55.1 million. $1.008 billion is from federal funds, and another $407.3 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, compared to $400.2 million the previous year.

Referred to the Committee on Appropriations

March 23, 2010

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

March 25, 2010

Substitute offered

The Appropriations Committee substitute. This was bypassed in favor of a version that contains additional changes in a few line items.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Motion to reconsider by Rep. Kathy Angerer (D-55)

O reconsider the vote by which the House adopted the substitute previously recommended by the Committee on Appropriations.

The motion passed by voice vote

Substitute offered

The Appropriations committee substitute. This was bypassed in favor of a version that contains additional changes in a few line items.

The substitute failed by voice vote

Substitute offered by Rep. Richard Hammel (D-48)

To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Democratic-majority in the House on various spending items and programs. For details see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billanalysis/House/pdf/2009-HLA-5884-8.pdf">analysis</a> from the non-partisan House Fiscal Agency.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Richard Hammel (D-48)

To require the Department to find ways to reduce the amount of general fund revenue used to support its operations by 3 percent.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Bill Rogers (R-66)

To require the department to post on the internet a listing of all expenditures, including federal "stimulus" money, with the purpose of each (a "check register").

The amendment passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Richard Hammel (D-48)

To prohibit the department from spending more than $10,000 to implement the "check register" provision proposed by the Rogers amendment that was adopted.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 55 to 54 (details)

The House version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.495 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $43.9 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $55.1 million. $1.008 billion is from federal funds, and another $407.3 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, compared to $400.2 million the previous year.

Received in the Senate

April 14, 2010

Referred to the Committee on Appropriations

May 14, 2010

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

May 18, 2010

Substitute offered

To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Republican-majority in the Senate on various spending items and programs. For details see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billanalysis/Senate/pdf/2009-SFA-5884-U.pdf">analysis</a> from the non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Sen. Martha G. Scott (D-2)

To add $124,500, reportedly to fund a new government "Office of the Insurance Advocate".

The amendment failed 16 to 22 (details)

Amendment offered by Sen. Glenn Anderson (D-6)

To increase funding by $4.5 million on a government "no worker left behind" jobs training program.

The amendment failed 16 to 22 (details)

Amendment offered by Sen. Martha G. Scott (D-2)

To strip out language prohibiting the Granholm or next administration from using money in this budget to develop or impose "ergonomics" regulations on businesses.

The amendment failed 16 to 22 (details)

Amendment offered by Sen. Martha G. Scott (D-2)

To strip out language prohibiting the state insurance bureau from implementing a ban on insurance companies using credit scoring in establishing premiums.

The amendment failed 15 to 22 (details)

Passed in the Senate 23 to 15 (details)

The Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.260 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $47.6 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $55.1 million. $834.5 billion is from federal funds, and another $342.8 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, compared to $400.2 million the previous year.

Received in the House

May 19, 2010

To concur with a Senate-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.

Failed in the House 0 to 107 (details)

Received in the Senate

Sept. 21, 2010

Passed in the Senate 33 to 5 (details)

The House-Senate conference report for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Labor and Economic Growth. This would appropriate $1.278 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.424 billion, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. $845.2 billion is from federal funds. $349.9 million is from state “restricted funds,” or earmarked tax and fee revenue, and $47.6 million is from the state general fund, compared to $400.2 million and $55.1 million the previous year, respectively. Note: The large decrease in gross spending is mainly due to transferring the $211 million Michigan State Housing Development Authority to the Department of Treasury.

Received in the House

Sept. 21, 2010

Passed in the House 66 to 41 (details)

Signed with line-item veto by Gov. Jennifer Granholm

Sept. 30, 2010