Introduced
by
To prohibit a state department from promulgating rules more stringent than required by federal standards, unless specifically required by state statute, or if the department director determines there is a "clear and convincing need" to do so.
Referred to the Committee on Oversight
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Amendment offered
by
To specify that the "no more stringent" provision would apply in cases where "exceptional circumstances" warrant it.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 57 to 50 (details)
To prohibit a state department from promulgating rules more stringent than required by federal standards, unless specifically required by state statute, or if the department director determines "the preponderance of the evidence" shows a need to do so. Republican Gov. Rick Snyder has vetoed previous versions of this proposal..
Referred to the Committee on Oversight
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Passed in the Senate 24 to 13 (details)
To prohibit a state department from promulgating rules more stringent than required by federal standards, unless specifically required by state statute, or if the department director determines there is a "clear and convincing" need to do so. Republican Gov. Rick Snyder has vetoed previous versions of this proposal.
Passed in the House 57 to 51 (details)
Motion to reconsider
by
The vote by which the house passed the bill.
The motion passed by voice vote
Received
Amendment offered
by
To establish a new date on which the bill will go into effect if passed.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 57 to 52 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
Passed in the Senate 23 to 14 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
